ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT
No. CR 06-887
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
TOMMY RAY MOSLEY
Appellant
v.
STATE OF ARKANSAS
Appellee
Opinion Delivered January 25, 2007
PRO SE MOTION TO FILE BELATED
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
[CIRCUIT COURT OF GARLAND
COUNTY, CR 94-486, HON. JOHN
HOMER WRIGHT, JUDGE]
MOTION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Tommy Ray Mosley was convicted of rape in 1995 and sentenced as a habitual offender to
life imprisonment in the Arkansas Department of Correction. This court affirmed. Mosley v. State,
323 Ark. 244, 914 S.W.2d 731 (1996). Subsequently, he sought pro se postconviction relief
pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.1. The trial court denied the petition, and appellant failed to timely
pursue an appeal. Mosley v. State, CR 97-919 (Ark. Oct. 23, 1997) (per curiam). He then sought
pro se leave of this court to reinvest jurisdiction in the trial court to consider a petition for writ of
error coram nobis. This court denied the petition. Mosley v. State, CR 95-872 (Ark. May 14, 1998)
(per curiam). Next, appellant filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Garland County
circuit court, although he was incarcerated in Lincoln County. The trial court denied the petition and
this court dismissed the appeal. Mosley v. State, CR 05-243 (Ark. May 12, 2005) (per curiam). This
court additionally denied appellant’s pro se motion for reconsideration of the dismissal. Mosley v.
State, CR 05-243 (Ark. June 30, 2005) (per curiam).
In 2006, appellant filed in the trial court a pro se petition to correct an illegal sentence
-2-
pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. §16-90-111 (Repl. 2006). The trial court denied the petition as being
untimely filed, and appellant, proceeding pro se, lodged an appeal here from the order denying the
petition. The State filed a motion to dismiss the appeal based on the trial court’s lack of jurisdiction
to consider the matter and this court granted the State’s motion to dismiss. Mosley v. State, CR 06-
887 (Ark. Nov. 2, 2006) (per curiam). Appellant’s pro se motion