VRI vs In-Person Medical Interpreters with Cost Benefits 2025

VRI vs In-Person Medical Interpreters with Cost Benefits 2025, updated 10/11/25, 6:20 AM

categoryOther
visibility1
  verified

Healthcare administrators juggling language access requirements with tight budgets face a critical decision: when does video remote interpreting save money versus in-person services? One regional chain's strategic approach cut costs by 65% while maintaining quality.

Gateway Languages City: Bellingham Address: 114 West Magnolia Street #400-135 Website: https://www.gatewaylanguages.com

Tag Cloud

VRI vs In-Person Medical Interpreters with Cost
Benefits 2025
Video Remote Interpreting offers cost savings reduced
travel expenses, per-minute charging, with actual
savings depending on factors such as rates, language
needs, & service volume
In-person interpreters are
essential for complex
procedures, behavioral health
sessions, and DeafBlind patients
requiring tactile communication
A regional urgent care chain achieved 65% cost reductions with a blended model while
maintaining patient satisfaction above 90%
Successful VRI deployment requires HIPAA-
compliant infrastructure and proper staff training
Strategic deployment optimizes cost-effectiveness &
patient outcomes for healthcare admin. Healthcare
administrators strive to cut costs while upholding
patient care standards
With language access crucial due to federal mandates and diverse populations, balancing cost-
effectiveness and outcomes is challenging

https://www.gatewaylanguages.com/

Find Out More At https://www.gatewaylanguages.com